Tate Fegley: Crime and Punishment in a Libertarian Society
![Tate Fegley on Mises Weekends](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/static-page/img/MisesWeekends_Logo_Fegely_20150715.jpg.webp?itok=SC_Lkfsf 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/static-page/img/MisesWeekends_Logo_Fegely_20150715.jpg.webp?itok=DfDzjaCR 870w,/s3/files/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/static-page/img/MisesWeekends_Logo_Fegely_20150715.jpg.webp?itok=oYIRhtsp 1090w,/s3/files/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/static-page/img/MisesWeekends_Logo_Fegely_20150715.jpg.webp?itok=9CAln_oT 1310w,/s3/files/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/static-page/img/MisesWeekends_Logo_Fegely_20150715.jpg.webp?itok=4RDjeB_g 1530w)
Tate Fegley and Jeff Deist discuss what crime and punishment might look like in a libertarian society, and how to convince skeptical libertarians that private police can do a better job of dealing with violence, theft, and fraud.
Private, competing defense agencies would operate with completely different incentives than state police: unlike government cops, private cops get fired when crime goes up. Private police have a direct financial interest in avoiding escalation of conflicts, avoiding legal liability for death or injuries, and avoiding damage to their agency’s reputation. And under a Hoppean insurance model, both insurance companies and property owners have a direct incentive to prevent, rather than merely respond, to crime.
Finally, they discuss how direct restitution, rather than lengthy taxpayer-funded incarceration, would be a more economically efficient and more humane approach to helping crime victims.