Clarence Darrow (1857–1938)
![The Libertarian Tradition](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/static-page/img/The-Libertarian-Tradition_750x516_20141125.jpg.webp?itok=iHqUK2Ig 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/static-page/img/The-Libertarian-Tradition_750x516_20141125.jpg.webp?itok=mlXdvF6O 870w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/static-page/img/The-Libertarian-Tradition_750x516_20141125.jpg.webp?itok=wZXBsGL0 1090w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/static-page/img/The-Libertarian-Tradition_750x516_20141125.jpg.webp?itok=-XsTNMph 1310w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/static-page/img/The-Libertarian-Tradition_750x516_20141125.jpg.webp?itok=XAYEeV4W 1530w)
The Clarence Darrow of 1902 was on pretty much the same wavelength as the Murray Rothbard of 80 years later. They both rejected the statist means. A criminal lawyer, Darrow held that “No condemnation is just, and no judgment is righteous. All violence and force are cruel, unjust and barbarous, and cannot be sustained by the judgment of men.”