San Jose’s Gun Tax Has Nothing to Do with Reducing Crime
![Audio Mises Wire](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=-YVs9bGp 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=Ry3vrlrf 870w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=df3M-3lK 1090w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=paTFGbVB 1310w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=eIMm0OdX 1530w)
California politicians say “gun owners should cover the costs of gun violence.” Apparently, holding actual criminals responsible for their own misdeeds is too much work in California.
Original Article: “San Jose’s Gun Tax Has Nothing to Do with Reducing Crime“
This Audio Mises Wire is generously sponsored by Christopher Condon. Narrated by Michael Stack.