No, More Bureaucracy Would NOT Have Saved Trump’s Paycheck Protection Program
![Audio Mises Wire](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=-YVs9bGp 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=Ry3vrlrf 870w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=df3M-3lK 1090w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=paTFGbVB 1310w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=eIMm0OdX 1530w)
The standard bureaucratic line after a program’s failure is that the government agents didn’t have enough authority or resources to handle the job. Neither explains the failure of Trump’s Paycheck Protection Program.
Original Article: “No, More Bureaucracy Would NOT Have Saved Trump’s Paycheck Protection Program“
This Audio Mises Wire is generously sponsored by Christopher Condon.