Murray Rothbard Was Right: Deposit “Insurance” Is Not Insurance at All
![Audio Mises Wire](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=-YVs9bGp 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=Ry3vrlrf 870w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=df3M-3lK 1090w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=paTFGbVB 1310w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=eIMm0OdX 1530w)
Insurance protects individuals from events that cannot be foreseen. As Murray Rothbard noted, however, deposit insurance exists to “protect” a system that is inherently bankrupt.
Original Article: “Murray Rothbard Was Right: Deposit “Insurance” Is Not Insurance at All”
This Audio Mises Wire is generously sponsored by Christopher Condon. ‘