Misunderstanding Both Lincoln and Basic Economics
![Audio Mises Wire](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=-YVs9bGp 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=Ry3vrlrf 870w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=df3M-3lK 1090w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=paTFGbVB 1310w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=eIMm0OdX 1530w)
Princeton “historian” Allen C. Guelzo’s newest hagiography of Abraham Lincoln focuses on Lincoln’s supposed love affair with commerce, albeit “commerce” based upon protectionism and government tariffs. As David Gordon notes, Guelzo has a problem getting his economic history correct.
Original Article: Misunderstanding Both Lincoln and Basic Economics