Failing to Make the Case for Race-Based Reparations
![Audio Mises Wire](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=-YVs9bGp 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=Ry3vrlrf 870w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=df3M-3lK 1090w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=paTFGbVB 1310w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/static-page/img/AudioMisesWire_750x516_20180223.jpg.webp?itok=eIMm0OdX 1530w)
In reviewing Reconsidering Reparations by Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò, David Gordon and Wanjiru Njoya point out the book’s many fallacies and the lack of a coherent theory of justice by the author.
Original Article: Failing to Make the Case for Race-Based Reparations