Mises Wire

Connor O'Keeffe

The federal government taking an ownership stake in Intel is neither a promising new approach to governance nor an unprecedented leap into economic fascism. It’s simply Trump embracing the corrupt status quo he ran against with a superficial rebrand.

Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.

“Because these meetings are held in the glare of world-wide media coverage, the parties to a dispute will be reluctant to make concessions.”

Birsen Filip

The US Cuban embargo continues, to the detriment of both countries. Not surprisingly, Murray Rothbard had strong opinions on the embargo, as he believed that US policies not only were self-defeating, but were outright harmful.

Wanjiru Njoya

Modern historians no longer seek historical truth but rather analyze history through series of politically-based narratives. But what happens when those narratives are effectively challenged? Mainstream historians then simply ignore the results and simply repeat what they have been saying.

Jonathan Newman

The Fed by design feeds the political machine in DC by concealing the costs of government spending. The Fed serves the government, not the American people.

Frank Shostak

Keynesian economists claim government budget surpluses are national savings, but real savings drive capital development. A surplus just means more revenue to the government, not the private economy.

George Ford Smith

For all of the talk about the need for “limited government,” we should always remember that the government has a legal monopoly on violence, and it uses that legal privilege often.

Daniel Sterbuleac

People (including most mainstream economists) assume that only a government bureaucracy can effectively deal with predicting disasters and alerting people in harm's way. However, this is an area of enterprise that is ripe for free markets.

Ryan McMaken

This is all a reminder that one should never take what Fed mouthpieces say as reliable insights into present or future economic trends.

Joseph Solis-Mullen

Since the Progressive Era, American foreign policy has seen one military intervention after another, leading to disastrous consequences. Historian Charles A. Beard understood the dangers and futility associated with these interventionist policies.