The Mystery of the Inverted Yield Curve
![Minor Issues](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/images/2024-03/Minor-Issues_720p_20240308.jpg.webp?itok=noe1tE0Z 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/images/2024-03/Minor-Issues_720p_20240308.jpg.webp?itok=BVigXeYB 870w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/images/2024-03/Minor-Issues_720p_20240308.jpg.webp?itok=wkIWiCBW 1090w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/images/2024-03/Minor-Issues_720p_20240308.jpg.webp?itok=So0nkb5q 1310w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/images/2024-03/Minor-Issues_720p_20240308.jpg.webp?itok=xHIbZWyF 1530w)
In this week’s episode, Mark looks back at the history of the Inverted Yield Curve. While many observers have now dismissed the significance of the yield curve inversion in 2022—and no recession, yet—Mark shows that the history of the IYC may back a completely opposite interpretation.
Be sure to follow Minor Issues at Mises.org/MinorIssues.