The Economics of the Civil War

Home | Mises Library | 3. The Union Blockade and Southern Strategy

3. The Union Blockade and Southern Strategy

Economics of the Civil War

Tags U.S. EconomyU.S. HistoryWar and Foreign Policy

02/02/2005Mark Thornton

Tariffs were generally favorable for the North and unfavorable for the South. They were a key political battle for forty years. The Union General Scott developed the anaconda plan to squeeze the breath out of the South. The Union Blockade was the first part of that plan. This battle at sea won the war for the Union. The land battle was a stalemate.

The South’s King Cotton strategy was to get the Europeans to intervene on the South’s behalf, but there was no real push for the Europeans to do so. The South should have aggressively exported their cotton into Europe, but they did not.

Lecture 3 of 8 from Mark Thornton's The Economics of the Civil War, presented to the Auburn University Academy for Lifelong Learners.



Contact Mark Thornton

Mark Thornton is a Senior Fellow at the Mises Institute and the book review editor of the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. He has authored seven books and is a frequent guest on national radio shows.

Shield icon audio