Help End the Fed on Lew Rockwell’s 80th Birthday
"If you hate war, oppose the Fed. If you hate violations of your liberties, oppose the Fed. If you want to secure freedom for yourself and your descendants, abolish the Fed."
"If you hate war, oppose the Fed. If you hate violations of your liberties, oppose the Fed. If you want to secure freedom for yourself and your descendants, abolish the Fed."
While F.A. Hayek saw human ignorance as the basis for what he called spontaneous order, Ludwig von Mises saw human reason as the basis for praxeology.
Academic elites claim that there is no objective truth, only social constructs. Thus, people can create their own reality in many areas, and everyone else is expected to accept whatever “reality” is presented—or face serious consequences.
Even as the Federal Reserve continues to manipulate interest rates to “fight” the results of the business cycle, Austrian economics teaches that business cycles occur because of the manipulation. They never learn.
If you hail deficit spending, you are embracing impoverishment. If you defend this kind of deficit spending, you are actively supporting stagnation.
The executive power in the United States is no longer a coequal power; it is the dominant power in the land, as Empire requires.
The current explosion in rental and home prices is the direct result of government intervention aimed at making it easier to buy a house. Mises wrote that government intervention into the market tends to make things worse. He was right.
What began as supposedly a free trade union has been turning into an authoritarian, interventionist nightmare. A recent speech by a top European Union commissioner shows the sad direction the EU is heading.
Sixteen Nobel prize-winning economists are declaring Bidenomics to be a huge success, and predicting economic disaster if Trump is elected. It's all further evidence of the pathetic, politicized state of “mainstream” academic economics.
Stephanie Kelton, the most visible promoter of MMT, is being derelict in her academic duties by not replying to Per Bylund’s critique of her theories in the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics.