Why Central Bank Digital Currencies Are a Bad Idea
The reasons why digital currencies are a bad idea are the same reasons why central banks are sure to implement them.
The reasons why digital currencies are a bad idea are the same reasons why central banks are sure to implement them.
Socialist regimes under the Soviets and the National Socialists silenced scientific theories that appeared to contradict the regime's ideological dogmas. The modern politicization of science is going down that road.
When governments subsidize projects, citizens pay twice—once as taxpayers who indirectly pay the subsidy, and then again as consumers in higher prices for the goods they buy and in reduced consumption.
During October 2020, year-over-year (YOY) growth in the money supply was at 37.08 percent. That's down slightly from September's rate of 37.54 percent, and up from October 2019's rate of 4.8 percent.
If the word “free” is to have any meaning, it should mean something more than whatever freedom remains after the government has finished restricting it.
Contra Marx, Mises understood that human desires and needs are not determined merely by biology.
Private firearms ownership decentralizes coercive power, transferring some of it from the state to the private individual. Naturally, political regimes oppose this. But even many non-Americans embrace private arms.
Although many central bankers have claimed the central banks are instrumental in ushering in a more green economy, a closer look suggests the opposite is true.
Not only is taxation theft, but by taking away part of the money you earn, the government is forcing you to work for it.
It's not a coincidence that the wealth of the top 1 percent began to really take off when the US ended the last remnants of the gold standard in 1973.