Revisiting Argumentation Ethics
Since 1988 I’ve been fascinated with Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s “
Since 1988 I’ve been fascinated with Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s “
The Democrats want trillions spent on infrastructure for a "Green New Deal." The GOP wants a trillion for roads and bridges. They're likely to find a way to "work together" to spend trillions either way.
The government's plan for "contact tracing" to prevent the spread of COVID-19 relies on huge amounts of government spending, plus unproven science as to the nature of the disease.
In the midst of a stock market bubble like this one, everyone from Warren Buffet down to the shoeshine boy has some great tips for you.
The saddest aspect of this economic ignorance is that these evangelicals have completely ignored the real reductions in poverty rates in the past forty years, reductions that are due to liberalizing economies that once were in socialist straitjackets.
Marx believed truth could only be fully understood by a certain socioeconomic class. Ludwig von Mises disagreed.
Rothbard has explained how it is wrong to equate what would be reasonable for a private protection agency with what is permissible for the state.
A second round of lockdowns will assault an America already suffering from widespread unemployment and a fragile economy. Even worse, round two is likely to last longer than round one, bringing an even larger economic and social toll.
It is possible to conceive of a world where fractional reserve banking is understood by both banker and depositor and involves no deception or fraud. But in that world, deposits cease to be money and become complex credit securities.
Faced with declining city budgets, harsh future COVID lockdowns, and more riots, many residents and business owners in America's core cities will likely decide the cities aren't worth the trouble anymore.