What the Midterms Mean
We argue viciously about who governs us from DC, less so about how and whether they should.
We argue viciously about who governs us from DC, less so about how and whether they should.
Voting "no" on a tax increase doesn't mean you really consented to it. And Lysander Spooner argued there's not anything wrong with voting "defensively."
New Brazilian president Bolsonaro does not pretend to understand much about economics, but some of his advisors may move in the right direction.
The more aggressive the central bank’s loose monetary stance is the more drainage of real wealth takes place and the less real wealth is left at the disposal of true wealth generators.
EU politicians seem far more concerned with political games than with trade liberalization.
When the advocate for a new tariff or a new regulation says he's willing to pay a few bucks more for the "good" of society — what he really means is you should pay more, whether you like it or not.
Government spending distorts and harms the wealth creation process. And cutting taxes without cutting spending won't lead to real economic growth.
Regardless of the midterm congressional election results, voters are not “consenting” to unconstitutional policies and federal crimes.
It costs more to run a campaign in a large jurisdiction than a small one. Making districts and states smaller would reduce the role of money in politics.
Not every neighborhood resident likes the trick-or-treat tradition of Halloween. But an answer can be found in a better adherence to property rights.