The post–Civil War economic boom famously ended in panic in 1873. Responses by Ulysses Grant, which were consistent with Austrian economic prescriptions, effectively mitigated the effects of the panic.

A new book by Feler Bose provides a robust economic argument that sexual and economic freedom are inversely related, while providing numerous empirical illustrations of this relationship.

Responding to monetary disequilibrium theorists, Jonathan Newman argues that MDT leads to a price level illusion, and that market processes should be allowed to run their course without monetary injections.

Did Jevons misinterpret Mills when he developed his sunspot theory of business cycles out of dissatisfaction with Mills’s “commercial moods”? Looking closer shows Mills believed credit expansion drove these moods.

Was Mises’s position in economics and the social sciences that of an isolated outsider, or was his research engaged with his contemporaries while remaining unique?

Modern technosocialists claim that access to large sets of economic data would allow the social planner, or a supercomputing machine, to plan the economy. Are they correct?

Nikolay Gertchev’s new book builds on Mises’s advancements in monetary theory, and successfully presents the modern bureaucratized European banking system in a manner intelligible to the reader.

Austrian investment theory emphasizes purposeful actions, learning, and individual judgment under uncertainty, in contrast to the static neoclassical and behavioral finance models.

Prof Huerta de Soto’s contributions, though less well known among English-speaking Austrians, span economics, law, history, and political philosophy, establishing his work as among the most influential in Europe today.

Wicksell rejected Mises’s claim that the natural rate of interest and market interest rates may be interdependent, but evidence here supports several features of Mises’s business cycle theory.