History of the Austrian School of Economics
Carl Menger’s Revolution
Discrete marginalism, despite being non-mathematical, is superior to neoclassical marginalism. Usage of derivatives is not a sign of a more scientific method.
David Gordon: The Life and Times of Murray Rothbard
Jeff Deist and David Gordon discuss Murray N. Rothbard's life from an insider's perspective.
Guido Hülsmann: Inside the Mind of Mises
The 1866 False Money Debate in the Journal des Economistes
The false-money debate of 1866 in the Journal des Economistes was the first time that uncompromising laissez-fair advocates clashed on the question of fiduciary media.
Profit and Production
Profits and losses provide powerful incentives. This essay explores the roles of profits and entrepreneurs in a market economy.
Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory: The Founding Austrian Version, by A.M. Endres
Endres has done an adequate job of high lighting elements of distinctiveness and similarity among the founding Austrians (Menger, Wieser, and Böhm-Bawerk) which go beyond the cut-and-dried methodological issues emphasized by later Austrians.
The Viennese Connection: Alfred Schutz and the Austrian School
In the following I shall try, first, to briefly introduce the two interpretations of Schutz’s relationship with the Austrians, and second, to cast new and more detailed light upon some aspects of the relationship
Lionel Robbins: Neoclassical Maximizer or Proto-Praxeologist?
The author believes the evidence presented in this paper raises serious questions for Kirzner’s interpretation of Robbins’s Essay. Mises certainly treated Robbins’s book
Frédéric Bastiat’s Views on the Nature of Money
I have re-examined Bastiat’s contributions to economic theory and have found the charges against him to be unsubstantiated. In terms of economic theory, Bastiat is widely knowledgeable
 
 
 
