Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 19, no. 2 (Summer 2016)
ABSTRACT: There is an emerging literature on the subject of skyscrapers and business cycles. Lawrence (1999) first noticed the correlation between important changes in the economy and the building of record-breaking skyscrapers. Thornton (2005) established a theoretical link between the two phenomena. Several papers have subsequently examined the impact of skyscraper building on the economy and in particular on the role of psychological factors on the building of record-breaking skyscrapers. Not surprisingly, most people scoff at this notion, and Barr et al. (2015) present extensive empirical evidence that skyscrapers do not cause changes in GDP, but precisely the opposite. Here we show what the skyscraper curse actually is, and show that the entire empirical literature on this subject supports the existence of a skyscraper curse, including most of Barr et al. (2015). In addition, we present new empirical evidence supporting the skyscraper curse.
KEYWORDS: Skyscraper Curse, business cycle, Austrian School
JEL CLASSIFICATION: B53, E32, E37, R11
Elizabeth Boyle is a former intern with the Mises Institute.
There is an emerging literature on the subject of skyscrapers and business cycles. We present new empirical evidence supporting the skyscraper curse.
Lucas M. Engelhardt is a Professor of Economics at Kent State University’s Stark Campus. His work is in macroeconomics, primarily in examining how various assumptions about capital affect business cycle models.
The Theory and Method faculty panel takes questions from Mises University students.
The Singer Building and the panic of 1907. The Empire State and the Depression. The Burj Khalifa and 2008. Lucas Engelhardt on why the world's tallest buildings keep opening at exactly the wrong moment.
A game show finalist looked at a rigged final round and told his opponent, "I'm going to steal—and then split it with you." He didn't play the game. He changed it. Lucas Engelhardt on entrepreneurs and game theory.
Mark Thornton is the Peterson-Luddy Chair in Austrian Economics and a Senior Fellow at the Mises Institute. He is the book review editor of the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, and has authored seven books and is a frequent guest on national radio shows.
Mark Thornton argues Washington is trying to manage bond yields, suppress gold’s warning signal, and sell AI as an inflation cure—even as debt and malinvestment pile up.
Mario Innecco speaks with Dr. Mark Thornton, Senior Fellow at the Mises Institute, about the growing risks facing the global economy. We discuss the end of the 40-year bond bull market, soaring government debt, the AI bubble, inflation, war, and the consequences of decades of artificially low interest rates. Dr. Thornton explains why he believes the government bond bubble poses a far greater threat than AI, why central banks cannot simply inflate their way out of the debt problem, and how Austrian Business Cycle Theory helps explain today's increasingly distorted economy. We also discuss the growing risk of economic, political and social unrest—and why sound money, limited government and change from the bottom up may ultimately provide the way forward.
The argument for AI solving inflation runs through productivity: better technology lowers costs, so prices fall. Dr. Mark Thornton takes that apart.
