Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 19, no. 2 (Summer 2016)
ABSTRACT: There is an emerging literature on the subject of skyscrapers and business cycles. Lawrence (1999) first noticed the correlation between important changes in the economy and the building of record-breaking skyscrapers. Thornton (2005) established a theoretical link between the two phenomena. Several papers have subsequently examined the impact of skyscraper building on the economy and in particular on the role of psychological factors on the building of record-breaking skyscrapers. Not surprisingly, most people scoff at this notion, and Barr et al. (2015) present extensive empirical evidence that skyscrapers do not cause changes in GDP, but precisely the opposite. Here we show what the skyscraper curse actually is, and show that the entire empirical literature on this subject supports the existence of a skyscraper curse, including most of Barr et al. (2015). In addition, we present new empirical evidence supporting the skyscraper curse.
KEYWORDS: Skyscraper Curse, business cycle, Austrian School
JEL CLASSIFICATION: B53, E32, E37, R11
Elizabeth Boyle is a former intern with the Mises Institute.
There is an emerging literature on the subject of skyscrapers and business cycles. We present new empirical evidence supporting the skyscraper curse.
Lucas M. Engelhardt is a Professor of Economics at Kent State University’s Stark Campus. His work is in macroeconomics, primarily in examining how various assumptions about capital affect business cycle models.
The Theory and Method faculty panel takes questions from Mises University students.
The Singer Building and the panic of 1907. The Empire State and the Depression. The Burj Khalifa and 2008. Lucas Engelhardt on why the world's tallest buildings keep opening at exactly the wrong moment.
A game show finalist looked at a rigged final round and told his opponent, "I'm going to steal—and then split it with you." He didn't play the game. He changed it. Lucas Engelhardt on entrepreneurs and game theory.
Mark Thornton is the Peterson-Luddy Chair in Austrian Economics and a Senior Fellow at the Mises Institute. He is the book review editor of the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, and has authored seven books and is a frequent guest on national radio shows.
Mark Thornton updates the Stocks versus Manure contest, then explains why gold’s correction may be temporary, and why democratic socialism attracts young voters with failed answers to real problems.
The Policy and History faculty panel takes student questions on the state of the movement and the prospects for freedom.
The US has 20 to 30 million government regulations. Big corporations have legal departments. Startups have you. Mark Thornton on who the "regulatory thicket" is really built to protect.
