Most interpretations of American free banking experiences in the nineteenth century focus on the failure of what is commonly believed to have been an experiment in unregulated banking. In this dissertation completed in 1988, economist Karen Y. Palasek advances the thesis that not only was free banking a strictly regulated system, but the reasons for its failure stem directly from the regulations themselves and from the regulatory ties between bond collateral requirements for competitively issued redeemable banknotes and a large volume of government debt which was essentially used as a reserve by free banks.
To illustrate the impediments presented by free banking laws, Palasek compares free banking experiences in New York to bank experiences in New England under the Suffolk System. She argues that the New England regional banking system that developed under the Suffolk was essentially a laissez-faire banking system, producing stability and safety for noteholders and depositors through market-driven behavioral constraints on the banks. New York, arguably the best example of American free banking, compares unfavorably on both stability and safety to the more laissez-faire system. The implications of this reexamination of free banking and the recent debates over the causes of instability in the free banking era have a bearing on modern reconsideration of deregulation and the self-regulating properties of a laissez-faire monetary system in the areas of stability, safety, and adequacy of banking facilities.
“Environmentalism and Economic Freedom: The Case for Private Property Rights”
Walter Block Environmentalism and Economic Freedom Acrobat Distiller 3.0 for Windows
“The Mishnah and Jewish Dirigisme”
Walter Block The Mishnah and Jewish Dirigisme Acrobat Distiller 2.0 for Power Macintosh
A Critique of Neoclassical and Austrian Monopoly Theory
One of the most controversial areas in Austrian economics, and one where even long-established Austrian theorists differ sharply, is monopoly theory.
The Historical vs. the Deductive Method in Political Economy
The offering which the most prominent leader of the younger generation of the historical school has made to the founder and head of that school, Wi
The Non Sequitur of the Dependence Effect
From the Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 27, April 1961.
An Economic Review of the Patent System
Study commission by the Subcommitttee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S.
Economics and Evolution: A Reply to Laurence Moss
(1995) Marshall Studies Bulletin 5: 41-50.
Capital Structure Evolution: Austrian Observations on the Case of Software Development
paper delivered at the Southern Economic Association meetings, New Orleans. (1999)
Austrian Theory of the Marginal Use and of Ordinal Marginal Utility, The
From Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie Journal of Economics, Spring 1977.
Capital Based Macroeconomics: Boom and Bust in Japan and the U.S.
Frédéric Bastiat: Two Hundred Years On
Mises Institute, 2001, essay on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of his birth.
Praxeology: Reply to Mr. Schuller.
Lionell Robbins The Nature and Significance of Economic Science (1932) First Edition
Statistics: Achilles’ Heel of Government
Jeff Tucker Microsoft Word - statistics.rtf Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)
Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution
Politics of Political Economists: Comment, The
Unknown PrecisionScan Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows
Politics of Political Economists, The
judy E:\OCCPAPER\HHHCov5.PDF Acrobat 3.0 Import Plug-in
The Mises We Never Knew
A tribute to Ludwig von Mises written by Murray N. Rothbard. This article appeared in the Libertarian Review, April 1978, pp. 37–38.
The Political Thought of Étienne de la Boétie
Étienne de la Boétie's discourse is lucidly and coherently structured around a single axiom, a single percipient insight into the nature not only of tyranny, but implicitly of the State apparatus itself.
Dr. Palasek is the Director of Educational and Academic Programs at the John Locke Foundation.
The amazing fact is that the great majority of British people are not yet consciously aware that they are living in a very severe economic crisis.
