Private Property

Most people favor patent and copyright law because they believe that it generates net wealth — that the value of the innovation stimulated by IP law is significantly greater than the costs of these laws.

Protectionism and all other forms of war by the state on its people are devastating, and need to be undone.

The total state claims the right to see you naked. A freer people would demand an end to such nonsense and the policies that perpetuate it.

If composers could set still-unmatched records of productivity without copyrights while earning a living, writers could do this in an environment t

In a governmentally controlled society, the unrestricted enjoyment of property ownership is not permitted, since government has the power to tax, regulate, and sometimes even confiscate (as in eminent domain) just about anything it pleases. In a laissez-faire society, everything which was valued and rationally claimed would be owned, and this ownership would be total.

I will focus on existing and emerging possibilities for writers to earn a living in a world where no copyrights exist.

So, some Americans are unloading their family treasures and cheering for bailouts, money printing, and gun control, while others are stocking up on precious metals, guns, and ammo to protect themselves and their wealth.

There is no question which group is the civilized one.

"Nagel thinks that people in society are morally bound to each other in ways that generate egalitarian obligations."

Although Aristotle, in the Greek tradition, scorned moneymaking and was scarcely a partisan of laissez-faire, he set forth a trenchant argument in