Other Schools of Thought

Because they are based upon a falsehood, Keynesian policies fail empirically, quite obviously to anyone with an open mind.

There is, after all, the surprisingly favorable response that libertarianism encounters from people in all walks of life.

It is Republicans, not libertarians, who favor handouts to and special privileges for big corporations. And Republicans are not libertarians.

Coke's legal-economic philosophy might be summed up in a phrase he used in Parliament in 1621: "That no Commodity can be banished, but by Act of Parliament."

"Just as everyone is born ignorant of math, so everyone is born a folk economist."

And to wind up at my own doctrine about history, following Albert Jay Nock, history is essentially a race or a conflict between state power and social power.

It is very difficult to convince someone that if they refuse free money they will be better off.

In light of all the varied and bizarre beliefs, usually incorrect and often pernicious, that have informed human communities throughout the past, is it inconceivable that the far more sensible views of libertarianism might someday become widely accepted?

"The idealist … sees the state as a neutral tool. If it can be used for the benefit of the rulers, it can be used for the benefit of the people, as if a slaughterhouse for the benefit of the farmer could be used for the benefit of the animals."

Pictures of the Socialistic Future warns that socialism, promising equality, can deliver only equal poverty and death.