War and Foreign Policy

Murray Rothbard discusses the critical turning point in Republican politics: 1946-1950.

Perhaps we would have a rational foreign policy — if Americans could be brought to realize that the first necessity is the renunciation of the lie as an instrument of foreign policy.

Delivered at the Mises Institute’s 25th Anniversary Celebration, 12 October 2007, in New York City.

Delivered at the Mises Institute’s 25th Anniversary Celebration, 12 October 2007, in New York City.

The drive of the New Deal toward war once again reshuffled the ideological spectrum and the meaning of Left and Right in American politics.

Of course Podhoretz's argument is wrong: it does not follow from the instability of a government that a successor regime can be easily established.

Greenwald's argument is a simple one: Because of the overwhelming military might of the United States, no other country can attack us without facing utter destruction. 

Norman Podhoretz, an eminent authority on the novels of Norman Mailer, has for decades postured as an expert in foreign policy as well.

Take the quiz. An

No person or group of people is without value — not even those whom our own government chooses to label the enemy.