War and Foreign Policy

It is frequently maintained that “free trade” belongs to “free immigration” as “protectionism” does to “restricted immigration.” This is erroneous.

Since the victors of warfare write the histories, one must look long and hard to find recognition of the radical critics of any given war.

In this paper I will attempt to analyze laws limiting emigration, migration, and immigration from the libertarian perspective.

In this paper, I will be dealing with various examples of individual or groups of progressive intellectuals, exulting in the triumph of their creed

According to the conventional wisdom, the United Nations in effect established the state of Israel, doing so when the General Assembly voted for th

The isolationist tradition in America, as it was manifested from 1939 to 1941, was based on two fundamental doctrines: avoidance of war in Europe and unimpaired freedom of action.

Two fundamental principles of Western law had their origins in Mosaic Israel. The first principle was the rule of law and the second principle was open immigration.

Historians increasingly recognize the important role that considerations of foreign policy played in shaping the Constitution.’ Leading Feder

Is there any “good” reason for a country such as the U.S.

The crux of the Arab-Israeli conflict is the Palestinian question, and the crux of the Palestinian question is: who justly owns the land of Israel