Paul Offit: Striking a Balance in Our Response to COVID-19
Dr. Paul Offit shares with us his thoughts on the response to the COVID pandemic: a response that should take into account the health costs of a severe economic downturn.
Dr. Paul Offit shares with us his thoughts on the response to the COVID pandemic: a response that should take into account the health costs of a severe economic downturn.
Dr. Anish Koka Anish discusses the COVID19 pandemic with Dr. Daniel Jafari, an emergency physician and surgical critical care specialist in New York.
It's time to stop pretending that the policies favored by some biologists—who know nothing about how economies work to lessen the health effects of poverty—come without grave costs to public health.
Why are governments so enthusiastic about shutting down businesses when other less draconian measures are available and prudent? The answer lies in the fact that governments can act with near impunity and want to maximize their power.
Bob Murphy comments on various aspects of the response to the coronavirus.
The costs of this government-forced economic collapse—in terms of lost lives and ruined health—are likely to be devastating.
What needs to be done in such a crisis is not to attempt to steer the market to ensure it provides what is needed, but to let it free to do what it always does: match the goals of entrepreneurial producers with the needs of the populace.
The latest health crisis has made it clear that governments put their own interests before those of the public while hiding crucial information and imposing counterproductive regulations.
You are not even allowed to ask: "Is the price we’re paying worth it?" or "Is this an abundance of caution, or an overdose?" The "serious people" attack anyone who urges calm and encourages others to adopt a "don’t panic" approach. The new party line is: panic = virtue.
Whether we're talking public health or economic growth, the Chinese regime's love of intervention and centralization has led to one crisis after another.