Booms and Busts

Displaying 831 - 840 of 1780
Joseph Calandro Jr.

Markets are not efficient as that term is currently used in academic finance. Rather, markets are reflexive in that market behavior and the fundamentals reflect each other via a two-way, interactive feedback loop.

Anthony J. Evans Toby Baxendale

We contribute to the debate over the contemporary relevance of the Austrian Business Cycle theory (ABC) by making three theoretical developments.

Philipp Bagus David Howden

Recognizing different types of savings allows for a more fruitful analysis of the business cycle. Sustainable investment activities must be financed by an equivalent amount of savings, both in length of availability and quantity. 

Adrián Osvaldo Ravier Peter Lewin

This article offers an analysis of the causes of the subprime crisis, explaining that it is not an isolated incident and that we should concentrate our attention on the Fed’s monetary policy 

John P. Cochran

Free banking is a process where the market makes the ultimate judgment on where to draw the line between money as a present good and money as a future good.

Douglas E. French

When the economics profession turns its attention to financial panics and crashes, the first episode mentioned is tulipmania. In fact, tulipmania has become a metaphor in the economics field. 

Mark Thornton

Ludwig von Mises established the foundations of modem Austrian economics while Irving Fisher established the foundations of modem mainstream macroeconomics and central bank policy. 

Greg Kaza

The Cantillon effects cited in Thornton (2005) are a consequence of the central bank, and result in entrepreneurial errors during expansions in the NBER’s US business cycle chronology. 

Thorsten Polleit

This volume brings together highly important and relevant essays from distinguished authors, all of which are firmly anchored in the tradition of the Austrian School of Economics.

Jörg Guido Hülsmann

The purpose of this article is threefold. First, we challenge Mises's theory by arguing that it is not generally and apodictically valid. Therefore, it cannot be part of economic theory which