A standard theorem in neoclassical public finance holds that income taxes are preferred to equal revenue excise taxes. Herbener (1988) rejects this theorem because the proof is (a) based upon methodologically suspect indifference curves and (b) must follow a certain conceptual ordering-namely the excise tax must first be placed upon consumers who are then given the option of facing an equal-revenue income tax and not vice versa. This comment demonstrates that indifference curves are not required to prove the theorem nor must the proof of the theorem follow a specific order.
The Preferred Tax Type: Comment on Herbener
![The Review of Austrian Economics](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/static-page/img/Review%20of%20Austrian%20Economics_20141002.jpg.webp?itok=a6Eoc_Lw 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/static-page/img/Review%20of%20Austrian%20Economics_20141002.jpg.webp?itok=7kFmefHW 870w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/static-page/img/Review%20of%20Austrian%20Economics_20141002.jpg.webp?itok=SpTrUqip 1090w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/static-page/img/Review%20of%20Austrian%20Economics_20141002.jpg.webp?itok=RUsAwBff 1310w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/static-page/img/Review%20of%20Austrian%20Economics_20141002.jpg.webp?itok=HttIwXLp 1530w)
Downloads
All Rights Reserved ©