Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

An Internal Weakness in Current Intertemporal Preference Theory

Downloads
This theoretical paper demonstrates that using utility functions to study intertemporal decisions creates an internal contradiction: nonfulfillment of comparability, which is a condition of constructing utility functions. It shows that Riemann’s rearrangement theorem leads to basket incomparability for infinitely lived agents in discrete time and considers Austrian theory the best replacement for the model that implies this conflict. It suggests also that cardinality cannot fix this problem, since it does not eliminate the likelihood of generating conditionally convergent series unable to represent the rankings of potential consumption streams.

CITE THIS ARTICLE

Marco V. Monge Mora, "An Internal Weakness in Current Intertemporal Preference Theory," Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 25 (2022).

image/svg+xml
Image Source: Photo by Diane Picchiottino on Unsplash
Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.
What is the Mises Institute?

The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard. 

Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.

Become a Member
Mises Institute