Bailout Blame Game

It may be that, 25 years from now, economic historians will note socialized credit markets came to America in exchange for production credits for “marine renewables” and new regulations for “residential top-load clothes washers,” which were among many of the riders added to the bailout legislation as the infamous week wore on.

Is there no other way to begin a “Week in Review” article?

I know I’ve read some version of these first two paragraphs several times, even in the last year, and even critiqued one or two previous pieces. It seems nearly inevitable that the New York Times “Week in Review” will begin a story on the week’s economic news with some version of the “end of laissez-faire” thesis, which is always the same: until now we’ve had this huge and doctrinaire faith in free markets but now events are forcing us to realize that government has a role to play and so we must now adjust to the fact that the market is not all it is cracked up to be.

Hazlitt’s Reflections at 70

My first 20 years were spent before the outbreak of World War I in 1914. Looking back at it, it seems now an idyllic world. There had been no major international wars for a century. There were no revolutions every week and riots every day. People could even trust their currency. There was no nuclear bomb hanging over us. There was no Communist government and not even an important organized Communist movement. Even socialism was merely a matter of academic discussion.