Abolition: Who Deserved Compensation for What?

If you can’t yet find all of Murray Rothbard’s writing on Mises.org, the gap is small and closing. For those of us who discovered Rothbard through his books, it is especially fun to see the seeds of certain chapters sewn a decade or two earlier in letters to the Volker Fund, letters to and short articles for The Freeman, or as brief editorials in his own newsletters, Left & Right, and Libertarian Forum.

The Recycling Myth

The coercive recycling structure is set up in layers, where the consumer (”producer” of waste) gets to do most of the work of sorting, cleaning, and transporting the trash to collection centers. Government-appointed companies then empty the containers and transport the materials to regional centers where the trash is prepared for recycling. And then everything is transported to centralized recycling plants where the materials are prepared for reuse or burning.

Thoughts on Market Anarchy

There are three questions that must be answered by any supporter of anarcho-capitalism, one per each branch of the government to be dissolved and replaced by a private solution. 1) How do I know what is or is not lawful for me to do? According to what procedure am I to be guided to behave properly? Rothbard’s answer is: use the natural law. To the question, “What is the natural law?” Rothbard replies: “To ask what is man’s nature is to invite the answer.

Michael Kinsley Loves Libertarians

In response to my gentle critique, he wrote in an email (that I assume he won’t mind me reproducing): Dear Mr Murphy: I read it this morning as it happens. I don’t have the time to dialogue with you about it, but I thank you for the respectful treatment. It’s one of the things that i like about libertarians that they are ALWAYS willing to engage, ALMOST always with complete intellectual honesty, and MOST of the time quite politely. Best wishes, Mike Kinsley

On the Money Supply definition Issue

I tried to post this as a reply to the criticism of my criticism of Frank Shostak’s money supply definition that the person calling himself Newson posted under Frank’s most recent article. It strangely disappeared so that’s why it’s posted under a new post (slightly reformulated since it is a new post rather than a comment under a post): First of all, I am not the only Austrian economist who thinks that Shostak’s definition of the supply of money is too narrow.

Reworded Broadband Plan Resold As New and Improved

In December I wrote a couple of articles detailing the telecom industry and the financial follies promulgated by the federal government and specifically the FCC. A quick update to both stories. This week a report (pdf) was issued by EDUCASE which suggested that the federal government should help bankroll part of a $100 billion endeavor to roll out faster broadband/more penetration throughout the US.

Correcting Kinsley on Libertarianism

An American liberal like Kinsley should (after 6+ years of the “War on Terror”) be aware of the great downside to a government monopoly of the military. Everything that is wrong with government control of, say, automobile production, carries over into the arena of defense. For example, costs are vastly inflated, and inefficiency abounds, because there is no direct link between the customer and the service provider.