Taking Money Back

To save our economy from destruction, wrote Murray Rothbard, and from the eventual holocaust of runaway inflation, we the people must take the money-supply function back from the government. Money is far too important to be left in the hands of bankers and of Establishment economists and financiers. To accomplish this goal, money must be returned to the market economy, with all monetary functions performed within the structure of the rights of private property and of the free-market economy.

Die Early, Save Taxpayers Money

The usual argument about smoking and anti-obesity laws is that people who are sick cost the public money. Time reports on an opposite view: the earlier you die, the cheaper it is for those paying the bills.

“The researchers found that from age 20 to 56, obese people racked up the most expensive health costs. But because both the smokers and the obese people died sooner than the healthy group, it cost less to treat them in the long run.”

A New Golden Age?

The new issue (on sale today) of Worth magazine features an article on “A New Golden Age” by Nathan Lewis which is a nice recap of the history of the gold standard showing that we (along with the Roman’s) thrived on a gold standard only to succumb to paper inflations.

“It is practically a truism that the decline of currency quality is mirrored in the decline of world power.” Lewis has a new book Gold: The Once and Future Money.

Standing Keynesian GDP on Its Head: Saving Not Consumption as the Main Source of Spending

According to the prevailing Keynesian dogma, consumption is the main form of spending in the economic system, while saving is mere nonspending and thus a “leakage” from the spending stream. This dogma underlies much of government economic policy in the United States, including the so-called economic stimulus package that has just been enacted. In this article, I prove, to the contrary, that consumption is not the main form of spending in the economic system and that the source of most spending is, in fact, saving.

Does Neuroscience Support Austrian Theory?

While the rational-expectations school attempts to explain away market bubbles and the ensuing crashes, the Austrian School, which formerly stood alone in providing a compelling explanation for these market phenomena, now has help from the neuroscience community, writes Doug French. In his book Why Choose This Book? Read Montague takes us inside the brain to understand how we make decisions. Montague is no economist. Neuroscience is his beat.

Simple: Government should completely control supply and demand

The NYT offers a solution to the drug problem in the U.S. but it is out of fantasy land: “The federal government needs to do more to slow the flow of money and guns that finance and arm the cartels in Mexico and Central America. There is little hope of ever defeating the traffickers abroad if the government isn’t doing enough to reduce demand at home.”

Study Guide to Human Action, Chapter XI

CHAPTER XI. VALUATION WITHOUT CALCULATION

CHAPTER SUMMARY

1. The Gradation of the Means

Acting man values means according to the valuation he places on the ends they can achieve. (An apple seed is valued through consideration of the future apples it can produce for consumption.) The totality of means needed for a given end would possess the same value as the end, except for the discount due to the waiting time involved. (The concept of time preference will be discussed in a later chapter.)