The unparalleled expansion of control that originated in the Enlightenment era’s fiscal state could lead to the implosion of civilization. But it may be impossible for people to understand why.

Hatim Kheir proposes a reformulation of Hoppe’s argumentation ethics, premised on arbitration as the chosen means of conflict resolution, which proves the right to ownership.

Bruce Gilley uses a policy analytic approach to study the evidence on pay equity policies, and finds that pay equity policies lack fundamental justification.

The market economy cannot be eradicated, but is omnipresent even if it is ostensibly outlawed.

F.A. Hayek’s concept of complexity undergirds his pro-market stances, and helps us understand what forms of intervention he thought acceptable, says Adam Lovasz.

Is it possible to “steal” from a thief? Sven Thommesen has argued that it is; Walter Block contends here that it is an impossibility.

How does libertarianism apply to COVID restrictions? Can libertarians, as libertarians, argue against universal antipandemic restrictions? In this reply to Walter Block, Norbert Slenzok says yes.

Charles Amos reviews Billy Christmas’s Property and Justice, finding that the author “mostly succeeds” in linking freedom to property rights. But there are two significant problems.

The theory that Hitler had been a confirmed believer in private ownership and an opponent of nationalization hides the contradictions – and also the development – of his economic ideas.

In his new book on the influential Jacob Taubes, distinguished historian Jerry Muller demonstrates an almost unparalleled ability to explain complex ideas in simple terms.