8.1 Mill’s importance

8.1   Mill’s importance

The Mills, father and son, had a fateful impact upon the history of economic thought. If James Mill played a crucial and neglected role in developing Ricardian economics and its philosophical ally, Benthamite utilitarianism, and in foisting them upon the British intellectual world, his son John was by far the most important force in reimposing Ricardian dominance two decades after it had fallen into decline.

9. Roots of Marxism: messianic communism

9   Roots of Marxism: messianic communism

9.1  Early communism

9.2  Secularized millennial communism: Mably and Morelly

9.3  The conspiracy of the Equals

9.4  The burgeoning of communism

9.5  Notes

9.1 Early communism

9.1   Early communism

For centuries the alleged ideal of communism had come to the world as a messianic and millennial creed. Various seers, notably Joachim of Fiore, had prophesied the final state of mankind as one of perfect harmony and equality, one where all things are owned in common, where there is no necessity for work or need for the division of labour. In the case of Joachim, of course, problems of production and property, indeed of scarcity in general, were ‘solved’ by man no longer possessing a physical body.

10. Marx’s vision of communism

10   Marx’s vision of communism

10.1  Millennial communism

10.2  Raw communism

10.3  Higher communism and the eradication of the division of labour

10.4  Arriving at communism

10.5  Marx’s character and his path to communism

10.6  Notes

10.1 Millennial communism

10.1   Millennial communism

The key to the intricate and massive system of thought created by Karl Marx (1818–83) is at bottom a simple one: Karl Marx was a communist. A seemingly banal or trite statement set alongside Marxism’s myriad of jargon-ridden concepts in philosophy, economics, history, culture et al. Yet Marx’s devotion to communism was his crucial point, far more central than the dialectic, the class struggle, the theory of surplus value, and all the rest.

11. Alienation, unity, and the dialectic

11   Alienation, unity, and the dialectic

11.1  Origins of the dialectic: creatology

11.2  Hegel and the man-God

11.3  Hegel and politics

11.4  Hegel and the Romantic Age

11.5  Marx and Left revolutionary Hegelianism

11.6  Marx as Utopian

11.7  Notes

11.1 Origins of the dialectic: creatology

11.1   Origins of the dialectic: creatology

‘Alienation’, to Marx, bears no relation to the fashionable prattle of late twentieth century Marxoid intellectuals. It did not mean a psychological feeling, of anxiety or estrangement, which could somehow be blamed on capitalism, or on cultural or sexual ‘repression’. Alienation, for Marx, was far more fundamental, more cosmic.

12. The Marxian system, I: historical materialism and the class struggle

12   The Marxian system, I: historical materialism and the class struggle

12.1  The Marxian strategy

12.2  Historical materialism

12.3  The class struggle

12.4  The Marxian doctrine of‘ideology’

12.5  The inner contradiction in the concept of‘class’

12.6  The origin of the concept of class

12.7  The legacy of Ricardo

12.8  Ricardian socialism

12.9  Notes

12.1 The Marxian strategy

12.1   The Marxian strategy

Marx desperately sought a materialistic dialectic of history, a dialectic that would account for all basic historical change and would lead inevitably to communist revolution. Lacking a Boehmeian ‘nisus’ or mystical inner drive to serve as motor of the dialectic, Marx had to fall back on class conflict embedded in historical materialism.

13. The Marxian system, II: the economics of capitalism and its inevitable demise

13   The Marxian system, II: the economics of capitalism and its inevitable demise

13.1  The labour theory of value

13.2  Profit rates and ‘surplus value’

13.3  The ‘laws of motion’, I: the accumulation and centralization ofcapital

13.4  The ‘laws of motion’, II: the impoverishment of the workingclass

13.5  The ‘laws of motion’, III: business cycle crises

13.5.1  Underconsumptionism

13.5.2  The falling rate of profit

13.5.3  Disproportionality