Mises Daily

Charles Lindblom is at it again. In God and Man at Yale, William Buckley, Jr.’s indictment of leftist teaching at Yale University written half a century ago,

Normally, the pool of suckers is limited to people who are at least somewhat ignorant of the capitalist system, and therefore don't know what is reasonably possible in terms of investment returns. Suckers tend to think that profits are based on theft and exploitation, instead of on hard-work and entrepreneurship, and they want a piece of the action.

 

The Nobel Committee has selected Vernon Smith for its economics prize. Smith was strongly influenced by Ludwig von Mises' treatise, Human Action, and for that Austrians can be grateful. Furthermore, Smith's research has demonstrated time and again that the Austrians are correct regarding human action in the marketplace and the mainstreamers are flat out wrong.

War is coming, we're still in recession, the public is still angry about 9-11 (hey, is all this connected?), so we must do something to rekindle a sense of joy in our own private lives. But what? What people on the home front have always done: throw themselves into the domestic arts, preferably something that is beyond the time and connects us with ancient truth. For my part, it is all about bread.

The answers we receive from the academics in response to the collapse of the Enron Corporation and the implosion of other firms are not answers at all. At best, they deal only with effects, or, at worst, reverse the pattern of cause and effect. To put it another way, writes William Anderson, the people who are supposed to know the answers don’t even know what questions they should pursue.

Many intellectuals believe that war is good for many things, including fixing up a weak economy, writes Adam Young. The coming invasion and occupation of Iraq will happen because the Bush administration believes in the Keynesian/Great Depression myth of perpetual war for perpetual prosperity.

The constant drumbeat of housing "investigative reports," cut from their common mold, would be almost farcical, if the problems were not so serious. But the fact that those problems exist today is deplorable, because they are the result of willful ignorance of what has long been understood about the housing market. 

It is hard to understand the vague and ill-defined laws Martha Stewart and Sam Waksal are accused of violating. But the premise of the law is not hard to divine: Competition in capital markets must proceed from a level playing field. All investors are entitled to the same information advantage irrespective of effort and abilities. In a word, socialism!

Those who have written in favor of distributism on moral grounds appear to revel in their ignorance of economics--as if a discipline devoted to the application of human reason to the problems of scarcity in the world could actually in itself be antagonistic to ethics and faith.

If someone is forced to engage in work that he otherwise would not do, and he is not paid compensation to which he agrees for that work, then we call this slave labor. It cannot be defined by any other term, writes William Anderson. Princeton's Paul Krugman and his followers, however, believe that the state should force people to do its bidding, even if it means they will not receive payment for their work.