Mises Daily

Displaying 4901 - 4910 of 6742
Ludwig Van den Hauwe

Ludwig van den Hauwe asks: what can we learn from a 120-year-old book on economics? Plenty.

Vedran Vuk

We want honest government, writes Vedran Vuk, but a politician cannot help one person without first stealing from someone else.

David Gordon

Michael Sandel attained fame, and perhaps fortune as well, early in his academic career. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice

Robert P. Murphy

In order to consume in the present, writes Robert Murphy, resources must be used in the present. That goes for government too.

Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.

So those scurvy bums at Wal-Mart are finally getting what is coming to them!

Murray N. Rothbard

In an essay that made his <a href="http://store.mises.org/Austrian-Perspective-on-the-History-of-Economic-Thought-2-volume-set-P273C0.aspx">masterpiece on the history of thought</a> famous, Murray Rothbard argues that Adam Smith should not be called the founder of economics, nor a theorist who improved on economic science, nor even a consistent defender of the market economy.

Robert Karl Merting

A lesser known tariff is affecting our gas market everyday, writes Robert Merting, and effectively boosts the profits enjoyed by our domestic refineries.

N. Joseph Potts
As China’s standards of living rise, writes Joseph Potts, people are facing a strange luxury: the presence of the chronically ill.
Jeffrey A. Tucker

You can hack your shower, writes Jeffrey Tucker, but do not do this lest you endanger your status as a law-abiding citizen who takes wimpy showers.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Robert Nozick and Bryan Caplan have blasted Austrians for rejecting the concept of indifference and then surrepticiously smuggling it back in by way of explaining marginalism. Are they right? Hans-Hermann Hoppe says, no, they are not right.