Free Market

Death of the Dollar

The Free Market

The Free Market 26, no. 2 (February 2005)


It is a sign of the times when the Chinese government, which was just granted market economy status by debt-laden Argentina, takes America to task over its gaping budget and trade deficits.

When interviewed by the Financial Times, published Nov. 22, Li Ruogu, deputy governor of the People’s Bank of China, admonished Washington not to blame outsiders for its disorderly accounts, but instead put its own house in order. "The problem is that they spend too much and save too little," he says.

Similarly, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan publicly acknowledged in Berlin that, "Given the size of the current account deficit, a diminished appetite for adding to dollar balances must occur at some point."

Market trends do seem to indicate that the fiat dollar era has arrived at an endgame. The greenback has fallen by more than 35 percent against the euro and 21 percent against the yen this year, setting record lows almost daily since spendthrift George W. Bush’s re-election. As America’s current account and budget deficits continue to bleed red unabated, traders all over the world are finally seeing red and dumping the dollar.

The precipitous fall of the leading fiat currency in the absence of a functioning gold standard is an inevitability predicted by adherents to the Austrian School at the outset of the disastrous Bretton Woods system that French economist Jacques Reuff referred to as "a childish game in which, after each round, winners return their marbles to the losers." 

The post-Second World War monetary architecture crowned the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, tying it to gold at a fixed sum and all other currencies fixed against each other. Under this pseudo gold standard, America’s central bank would convert dollars to gold on demand for foreigners. However, US policymakers assumed that gold redemption would fail to materialize and the Fed could inflate without sanction because foreign central banks would retain the dollars as reserves on which to pyramid their own currencies.

The system worked fine, as far as America was concerned, until the 1960s when European countries replaced an inflationary bent with hard money policies. Assailed by rampant inflation, the Vietnam War, and staggering trade and budget deficits, the US hemorrhaged gold at an accelerated pace, prompting President Nixon to close the gold window in 1971. The de facto declaration of national bankruptcy heralded the advent of free-floating currencies and the present stage of the dollar standard.

No longer constrained by even the nominal fetters of Bretton Woods’ pseudo gold standard, America has been able to purchase imports with fiat money churned out by the Fed, and uniquely finance its burgeoning indebtedness by issuing debt instruments in dollars. On the other hand, foreigners, stuck with unconvertible greenbacks since 1971, have had no choice but to adopt dollars, rather than gold, as the world’s reserve asset.

Consequently, the dollar standard, in both the fixed and floating variants, has fostered an unhealthy economic relationship whereby most major economies excessively rely on exports to the US and then funnel the greenback receipts back into America’s credit-hungry public and private sectors. Repatriated dollars seep into America’s financial system, furnishing banks a broader monetary base to pyramid credit upon, which can fund more US imports, thus perpetuating the world’s vicious economic cycle.


Distortions Galore

Figures acutely illustrate the scope of the distorted international monetary system. Since 1982, the US has run a current account deficit every year, save 1991. The IMF expects the 2004 total to exceed $630 billion, substantially larger than the $531 billion posted in 2003. Indeed, this year’s expected current account deficit dwarfs the GDP of all but nine of the world’s countries.

These persistent and widening trade imbalances, payable in dollars and US debt instruments, have tremendously expanded the amount of the world’s international reserves, presently estimated at $3.368 trillion.

Between 1969 and 1999 total international reserves, primarily consisting of deposits, currency, bonds, equities, and scarcely any gold, grew 20-fold, standing at roundabout $1.6 trillion. From January 2002 to July 2004 alone aggressive money creation by the Fed, coupled with insidious fractional reserve and central banking the world over, added a whopping $1.307 trillion to global currency reserves.

American indebtedness has burgeoned at a commensurately astounding clip. Total borrowing per annum (government and private sector) has grown from $89 billion in 1969 to $1.673 trillion in 2003 and cumulative outstanding debt stands at $22.394 trillion compared to $1.332 trillion in 1969. As one would guess, the US household savings rate declined from 10 percent in the 1980s to less than 1 percent today.

Put simply, the US requires about $2 billion per day from foreigners to appease its insatiable borrowing addiction.


Kings of the East 

Enter East Asian central banks. China, Japan, and the Asian "tigers" have prospered by gearing their economies toward exporting to America. Recurring trade surpluses with the US have been instrumental in boosting businesses, employment, and government revenues in these countries. Moreover, surfeit dollar receipts, when not plowed back into America, have financed the growing level of trade between the nations of East Asia.

Little wonder Asian governments have opted to use heavy purchases of dollar reserves to peg their currencies to the greenback at undervalued rates. Mean currency values keep Asia’s exports competitive, supporting the rapid growth that underpins its economic success.

At the same time, acquisitions of US Treasury bonds reduce American interest rates, which sustain spending and ensure that American consumers keep buying Asian wares. Without currency intervention by Asian central banks, America would not be able to finance its deficit without higher bond yields or a bigger fall in the dollar than what has already occurred thus far.

The downside of this policy is that as Asian central banks purchase dollars and dollar-denominated debt instruments in exchange for won, renminbi, yen, etc., it expands each country’s domestic money supply, precipitating their own boom and bust sequences.

Presently, Asia holds 65 percent of the world’s foreign currency reserves, or about $2.183 trillion. Japan and China hold $820 billion and $514.5 billion of foreign reserves—mostly dollars—respectively. Asian countries have a delicate choice to make. Does each nation continue to finance America’s spendthrift ways, courting boom and bust cycles of their own, or do they part with the dollar standard and permit their currencies to rise, thereby kicking the last leg out from under the dollar? 

Besides incurring a diminution in export competitiveness, the latter option threatens to wipe billions of dollars off Asian central bank balance sheets, as a declining dollar rapidly erodes the value of their vast stores of US debt instruments. In effect, a steep greenback descent would constitute another de facto default by America, albeit differently from 1971 in that the world’s biggest debtor will this time fail to pay on billions of central and fractional reserve banking produced dollars and debts.

Already, there are indications that Asian and other countries of the world are diversifying their holdings away from greenbacks. China is the pivotal player in deciding the dollar’s fate considering that Asia is almost, if not already, subject to renminbi ascendancy, rather than dollars. Should the Chinese government lose patience with the dollar and seek to move its foreign reserves into another currency, the rest of Asia will follow suit, precipitating a disorderly and calamitous rout of the greenback. The question is not if, but when, Asia will discontinue financing America’s staggering profligacy, even if it entails a rise in the value of their currencies.

To underscore the voracity of the dollar’s impending demise, the 27 November issue of the Financial Times furnishes a telling account published in its letter-to-the-editor section. The writer, who just returned from a business trip to Vietnam, recalls how when a 7-year-old street urchin asked him for money, the child refused his offer of a dollar, instead specifying euros.

A 100-percent gold standard, with its inherent price-specie-flow mechanism, would have precluded the tremendous accumulation of debt and annual trade deficits by America as well as the gross distortion of the international economy, whereby most major countries orient production toward exporting goods to America. As 50 years of the fiat dollar standard "boom" ends, the US and the world will reap what they have sown.

The dollar may not die anytime soon but its capacity for lording it over all living things is ending. 


Grant M. Nülle is a Research Fellow with the Mises Institute (


Nülle, Grant M. "Death of the Dollar." The Free Market 26, no. 2 (February 2005).

All Rights Reserved ©
What is the Mises Institute?

The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard. 

Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.

Become a Member
Mises Institute