Mises Wire

Home | Wire | Double Standards Are Rampant in Canada's Drug War

Double Standards Are Rampant in Canada's Drug War

  • an_drugs.PNG
0 Views

03/22/2019

On October 17, 2018, recreational marijuana was legalized in Canada, ending 95 years of prohibition. For those who believe, as I do, that individuals should have the freedom to determine their own consumption, this is good news. However, I am not congratulating Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party for making good on a campaign promise made three years earlier. Instead, I point out the inconsistency of not applying their rationale for pot legalization to the legalization of all drugs.

As for those Canadians who opposed the legalization of pot, they may have hoped that Andrew Scheer, leader of the federal Conservative Party, would be their champion if he wins the election later this year. However, Scheer also employs a double standard on this issue.

Justin Trudeau

In 2013, in reference to hundreds of thousands of criminal convictions because of marijuana, Trudeau said “Those are lives ruined.”

The Liberals 2015 campaign platform with respect to marijuana legalization stated that “too many Canadians end up with criminal records for possessing small amounts of the drug. Arresting and prosecuting these offenses is expensive for our criminal justice system. It traps too many Canadians in the criminal justice system for minor, non-violent offenses.”

In May of last year, Trudeau said “that legalization would squeeze organized crime out of the lucrative cannabis market,” and the government is focused on legalizing marijuana because “the current system hurts Canadians.” Trudeau was not exaggerating the harm done to Canadians. German Lopez at vox.com wrote that “In Canada, tens of thousands of people are arrested for marijuana offenses each year, ripping communities and families apart as people are thrown in jail or prison and gain criminal records.”

The harmful effects of Canada’s illegal drug markets mirror the effects of the drug war in the United States which has done almost nothing to curb drug addiction. Former U.S. Federal Judge Nancy Gertner said, “We were not leveling cities as we did in WWII with bombs, but with prosecution, prison, and punishment.” As Laurence Vance wrote, “The drug war is not only a failure, it is a monstrous evil that has ruined more lives than drugs themselves.”

Trudeau clearly stated his objective. He wanted to legalize marijuana in order to eliminate the influence of organized crime and avoid future harm done to Canadians. Yet, at the same time, he refused to advocate for legalization other, harder drugs. His apparent indifference to organized crime and the harm done to Canadians by other illegal drug markets (heroin, cocaine etc.) suggests that his promise to legalize pot may have been nothing more than a ploy to win a few votes, and never based on any genuine concern for the wellbeing of Canadians.

Trudeau’s drug policy will do nothing to alleviate the wretched social and economic effects of Canada’s remaining illegal drug markets.

Andrew Scheer

Andrew Scheer takes the opposite position, although he is equally incoherent. As leader of the federal Conservative Party, Scheer is “opposed to the legalization of recreational marijuana for adult use in principle [emphasis added],” but he “seems to acknowledge the economic pitfalls of trying to reinstate prohibition once tens of thousands of Canadians are employed in income-tax-paying CPP-contributing jobs related to the cannabis sector.”

Scheer's views are curious. He said “If this [marijuana] is something that has been legal for a period of time, it’s going to be very difficult to … make this illegal again.” So what? Marijuana was legal for a period of time before it was made illegal in 1923. Aren’t politicians supposed to fight for what they believe is right? If Scheer is a man of principle, he should be telling voters that his goal is to re-criminalize cannabis if he is elected later this year, regardless of how difficult he thinks this will be to accomplish. If Scheer’s behaviour, as seen through the political policies which he does or does not promote, is not consistent with his principles, then he is unprincipled. And that seems to be the case. If elected, Scheer says he will maintain marijuana's legal status .

If Scheer believes he cannot win the election by standing firm on this principle, then perhaps he should not be the leader of the party, let alone a politician. Voters want to elect a person they can trust, a person who not only shares their principles, but who will, without exception, always stand on principle. If a principle is open to compromise, it is no longer a principle, and a politician who is willing to cast aside one principle will not hesitate to cast aside other principles, promises, and commitments.

Conclusion

Sadly, the double standards of Scheer and Trudeau are matched by the behaviour of almost every politician in the country. In their pursuit of power, they seem willing to say or do whatever it takes in order to get elected, and unprincipled politicians are notorious for breaking campaign promises post-election. Trudeau broke promises. His predecessor (Harper) broke promises. They all do, at every level of government.

For those of us who consistently promote the cause of liberty, we can be thankful for the legalization of marijuana in Canada, but this does not mean we should give any credit to the government. Sometimes, we win by accident. Trudeau and the Liberals were under intense political pressure to keep that promise because they had broken so many others.

Following a 23-year career in the Canadian financial industry, Lee Friday has spent many years studying economics, politics, and social issues. He operates a news site at www.LondonNews1.com

Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.
Image source:
iStock
When commenting, please post a concise, civil, and informative comment. Full comment policy here

Add Comment

Shield icon wire