Put Your Hope In Radical Decentralization
Do not put your trust in democracy, but neither should you trust in a dictatorship. Rather, put your hope into radical political decentralization.
Do not put your trust in democracy, but neither should you trust in a dictatorship. Rather, put your hope into radical political decentralization.
The ballooning size of legislative districts in the US is just one more illustration of how the United States is too large.
The only way we can get along is to de-yoke from Washington.
The modern drive to centralize European government and make a European superstate threatens to destroy what made Europe great in the first place.
When used properly, and when restrained by the prevalence of a relatively laissez-faire ideology, democracy can indeed work as a brake on government power.
Those who wish to portray Ludwig von Mises as the "moderate" one, compared to the more radical Murray Rothbard, will often point out that Mises was no "anarchist". This assertion, however, runs into trouble when we consider Mises's comments in Liberalism.
In the 19th century, many western states gave the vote to non-citizens, and by using their control over who could vote, states indirectly controlled citizenship standards in the United States.
In this adaptation of a Q and A session at the Mises Institute, Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne discusses the potential for revolutionary change that could come to both markets and states with the spread of new technologies like the block chain.
Although federal courts have struck down their efforts, states and local governments have attempted to limit taxpayer subsidization of migrant populations. This central planning of immigration by the Feds has served only to increase conflict while swelling the size of government.