Mises Search
Welcome to our search page.
As you use the search throughout the site, there are a few things to keep in mind:
- You can filter results by date, author, topic, and other attributes on the left
- To save a search use the bookmarking feature in your browser
- Download current search results as a CSV
- Search found 5 items for:
- Stephan Kinsella
- Legal System
- 2009
Mises Daily
Author:
Stephan Kinsella
Online Publish Date:
Like many libertarians, I initially assumed intellectual property (IP) was a legitimate type of property right. But I had misgivings from the start: there was just something too utilitarian and results oriented in Rand’s purportedly principled case for IP, and something too artificial about the state’s copyright and patent statutory
Mises Daily
Author:
Stephan Kinsella
Online Publish Date:
“Calls for abolition of the patent system — especially those coming from a principled, rights-based approach — are very unlikely to be adopted at the present time.” [This paper is the first of a two-part series. The concluding article is “ Reducing the Cost of IP Law “] Hardly a day passes when we do not hear of one patent abuse or another. [1]
Mises Daily
Author:
Stephan Kinsella
Online Publish Date:
[This article is based on a speech delivered at Mises University 2009 (July 30, 2009; audio ; video ).] Most libertarians find some areas of libertarian theory more interesting than others. My own passion has always been rights theory and related areas, such as the theory of contracts, causation, and punishment. [1] Intellectual property (IP),
Mises Daily
Author:
Stephan Kinsella
Online Publish Date:
Como muchos libertarios, inicialmente asumí que la propiedad intelectual (P.I.) era un tipo legítimo de derecho de propiedad. Pero yo tenía mis dudas desde el principio: había algo demasiado utilitario y orientado a los resultados en el caso de Rand, supuestamente basado en principios, para la propiedad intelectual, y algo demasiado artificial en