National Review and Accountability

It is rare that public intellectuals are held to account for their past positions relative to “adjustments” made later in light of events. So it is particularly satisfying to read Marcus Epstein’s devastating chronicle of National Review’s unacknowledged flip-flop on the Iraq War—a chronicle made necessary because NR itself has so far not admitted its own culpability in the calamity, much less admitted that the war’s critics proved wholly correct.

Money in Politics: A Red Herring

Campaign finance reform never works, unless its goal is simply to create new regulations and stifle political speech. But this is beside the point. As long as the government has the power to pick winners and losers in business, market-actors will have an incentive to invest, by whatever means necessary, in political influence.Soft money, hard money, issue ads, PACs, “bundling,””party-building activity,” federal matching funds, and so on.

Doubts creep in

They don’t draw the right conclusions but at least some of them have been humbled a touch: “Economists’ missed trends may indicate sea change“ (Knight Ridder Tribune News): Whether it’s policy gurus like Alan Greenspan at the Federal Reserve or academic theorists like free-trade champion Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University, economists are widely viewed as people who can divine where society needs to go and discern how to get there.