Business “skills” are overrated
This is an interesting article that rings true.
This is an interesting article that rings true.
A new study suggests that private schools are not inherently better than public schools. Surprised? Enough people were such that the study, funded by the US Department of Education, has created a stir in the education arena, as well as in the national news. But I want to argue that the results are meaningless, and for reasons not having to do with the methodology employed in the study.
Good interview here. I liked his comments on “Net Neutrality“: When asked what he thought about it, he responded:
Barron’s ($) recommends Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s book Economics and Ethics of Private Property among five books on its list of “page-turners on the dismal science”:
In 1959, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev and Vice President Richard Nixon walked through a replica of a six-room American ranch house that was on display at the American National Exhibition in Moscow.
USA Today has a very nice story on the effects of Clinton’s 1990s welfare reform. Contrary to the predictions of disaster, the tougher rules actually ended up being a step in the right direction. The rules made it more costly for those on welfare to stay there forever.
“Welfare caseloads nationwide have declined by nearly 58% since the landmark overhaul of the nation’s welfare system in 1996.”
Roger Garrison calls our attention to this fascinating post by David Laidler, who is discussing the Austrian theory of the trade cycle. His description seems fairly competent and his account of the times is strikingly interesting. But what in particular draws my attention is his account of why the promising theory of the Austrians never went mainstream in the years that it might have:
The woman from whom we’re subletting clearly leans to the left when it comes to politics. The other day I started reading her copy of Al Franken’s LIES and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right. Believe it or not, Franken is a remarkably well-informed and clever writer. Not only did he surprise me with his analysis, but he’s even funnier than I had concluded from watching his antics on Saturday Night Live.