Investment that Raises the Demand for Capital

[This article first appeared in The Review of Economic Statistics, November, 1937.]

The purpose of this article is to state a proposition which underlies the modern “monetary over-investment theories” of the trade cycle in a form in which, as far as I know, it has never before been expressed but which seems to make this particular proposition so obvious as to put its logical correctness beyond dispute.

Washington Irving: Critic of Loose Money

During the Panic of 1819, writes Sean Corrigan, the well-known American author, Washington Irving (of “Sleepy Hollow” fame), was enjoying a prolonged trip to Europe. During his sojourn there, he turned his hand to a treatment of that earlier moral fable of financial hubris and nemesis, the Mississippi Bubble. So vivid is the description of the background to the folly — and so utterly unchanging is the course of the pathology there laid out — that an extended quote, taken from the collection of essays entitled “The Crayon Papers,” is surely merited for our instruction

Give The Japanese An “A” for Effort

Historically, you know, we have a couple of grievances with the Japanese. First, healed over like an old wound, are the events of December 7, 1941. In the usual American tradition, we won that war but we lost the peace — said the experts. (I’ll tell you why later.) Next, was the Great Scare of the eighties when armies of U.S. economists, with teary eyes and downcast faces, predicted the mortal wounding of the U.S. economy. The Japanese system — a partnership of government and business, would flourish. They’d steal our jobs.

Capital Supply and American Prosperity

I

One of the amazing phenomena of the present election campaign is the way in which speakers and writers refer to the state of business and to the economic condition of the nation. They praise the administration for the prosperity and for the high standard of living of the average citizen “You never had it so good,” they say, and, “Don’t let them take it away.”

Reflections on the Pure Theory of Money of Mr. J.M. Keynes

Introduction by Joseph T. Salerno

Friedrich A. Hayek was only thirty-two years old when he published this two-part article in Economica, at the time, the world’s leading English-language economics journal. The article is a review essay of John Maynard Keynes’s two-volume book, A Treatise on Money, published the previous year. Keynes, a generation senior to Hayek, was at the time the leading economist of the British Cambridge School and had already achieved world renown as a public intellectual.