More on Ron’s book
A very nice review here. I hadn’t really thought of how this book is capable of being a kind of summary statement of political views for a generation of young activists — defining and refining.
A very nice review here. I hadn’t really thought of how this book is capable of being a kind of summary statement of political views for a generation of young activists — defining and refining.
[This Mises Daily was originally published May 7, 2008. An MP3 version of this article, read by the author, is available for download.]
It seems that we may never rid ourselves of the broken-window fallacy.
We now have Ron Paul’s book in, and I must say that it is very impressive. It is not just a campaign book. Actually it isn’t one at all. It is a world-view book, issue by issue, and very compellingly argued. I would not hesitate at all to give this to somehow who knows nothing about the libertarian point of view. It is also a manageable size.
Americans, perhaps like all people, have a remarkable capacity for tuning out unpleasantries that do not directly affect them. I’m thinking here of wars on foreign lands, but also the astonishing fact that the United States has become the world’s most jail-loving country, with well over 1 in 100 adults living as slaves in a prison. Building and managing prisons, and locking people up, has become a major facet of government power in our time, and it is long past time for those who love liberty to start to care.
The Ricardian treatment of rent was actually quite similar to the marginal utility analysis of prices; the classical economists were simply wrong in applying the concept of “differential rent” only to parcels of land, and not to every productive factor. More generally, the classical trichotomy of land, labor, and capital — which earned incomes of rent, wages, and profit/interest respectively — was untenable.
A man may overcome the disutility of labor — which is the same thing as saying he will be willing to forego the pleasures of leisure — for various reasons, including:
Peter Boettke from The Austrian Economists: “It is with great pleasure that I announce that Dan D’Amico successfully defended his dissertation on Tuesday April 22, 2008. Dan is a deep thinker and committed Austrian economist and radical libertarian social thinker. His dissertation addressed the ‘imprisoner dilemma’. D’Amico uses economic analysis (market process theory and public choice analysis) to examine and adjudicate the debates in criminal justice.
Monetary calculation is the guiding principle of action in any society with a division of labor. It transforms the very thought process of anyone considering action that involves the property of others. Potential actions are evaluated on the basis of expected costs and revenues, while past actions are evaluated with the accounting of profit and loss.