The Misesian: On February 28, the United States declared war on Iran with Operation Epic Fury. How should Americans view this new conflict within the context of the global war on terror and the broader history of American military intervention?

Brandan Buck: In the past, you always had at least some sort of tenuous reading on an existing authorization for use of military force, like in the global war on terror. Those are often laughable, legally speaking, and often not very sound, but they were there.

Politics Without Politicians: The Case for Citizen Rule
Hélène Landemore
Thesis, 2026; 309 pp.

One way to grasp the essence of Politics Without Politicians is to view it as the polar opposite to Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Democracy: The God That Failed. Hoppe thinks that democracy is a mistake: Hélène Landemore, a professor of political science at Yale University, thinks we do not have enough of it. What we call democracy today in her view rests on an elitist premise.

This article is adapted from a talk presented at the Entrepreneurship Beyond Politics Mises Circle on February 21, 2026, in Oklahoma City.

The title of my talk is “How to Change the World: Entrepreneurship Versus Politics.” But we could probably drop the politics part altogether—and that is what I intend to argue. “How to Change the World: Entrepreneurship” is enough, because politics is largely impotent as a tool for change, at least for those of us who are libertarians.

“...I always hated work…” —John Law

Following President Trump’s address to the nation on Wednesday about the Iran War, stock markets suffered losses while oil prices rose. The decline in stocks and increase in oil prices reflected disappointment over President Trump’s failure to articulate a plan to end the Iran War and the related restraint of shipping through of the Strait of Hormuz.

This article is adapted from a talk presented at the Entrepreneurship Beyond Politics Mises Circle on February 21, 2026, in Oklahoma City.

Conflict over the natural world often originates in people’s different conceptions of how the natural world can and should be used. I like the many useful things people can make with the resources extracted from the land. Many people, like me, also enjoy wild land and views of wildlife. I like forests and rivers, and I like knowing that some species of antelope or whale is still with us, even if I never see one of them myself

Murray N. Rothbard is one of the all-time greats in Austrian economics and libertarianism. Period. When one studies his work and comprehends the overarching system he built, one immediately recognizes that Rothbard is indeed a giant whose shoulders free market scholars should aspire to stand on.

2026: The Year of Rothbard

We clearly live in a time when the idea of freedom is not exactly popular in Washington. The US government has gotten itself into another costly war, and federal spending is at historic highs. Federal deficits are running at levels that rival the worst year of the covid panic. The president has raised taxes on millions of Americans, and now the White House is even talking about drafting people into the military. Although price inflation is well above the Fed’s arbitrary 2% target, Trump and other federal politicians are demanding more easy money.

I have been dismayed by libertarians arguing for immigration as a human right. The saying, “No human is illegal” has a warm feeling to it. But the rights claim conflicts with the property rights of others. Here’s my hypothetical. Suppose one of America’s large, privately-owned ranches became an independent country. As part of the United States, the owner clearly possesses the right to exclude others; persons entering without permission would be trespassing. How can gaining sovereignty take this property right away from the owner?

In their book Who Killed the Constitution, Thomas E. Woods and Kevin C.R. Gutzman argue that the demise of constitutionalism—the principle of limited government—is by no means a recent development. It can be traced back several decades, “close to a century.” It is not the work of just one political party or another, but an assault from multiple sources: