Mises Review

Ever since World War II, the traditional American foreign policy of nonintervention in foreign affairs has had a bad press. 

As usual, my reviews have been too generous. Although Lind's earlier work, The Next American Nation, struck me as fundamentally med to me possessed of an interesting historical imagination.

David Frum's new collection of essays and columns is like the curate's egg good in parts. 

A review of a book review is hardly standard procedure, but Backhouse's article is a major scholarly assessment of Rothbard's History. 

Professor Marshall De Rosa's excellent book calls attention to a paradox in recent constitutional law. 

Murray Rothbard had a remarkable ability to ask fundamental questions that others, even those within his own free-market camp, missed. After Rothbard touched an issue, it could never remain the same. 

Clint Bolick, it appears, does not suffer from the vice of false modesty. Mr. Bolick attracted considerable attention owing to his opposition to Lani Guiniers nomination as Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights;

A familiar Austrian criticism of mainstream neoclassical economics is that it lacks touch with reality. 

Michael Lerner fears ridicule, with good reason. His "politics of meaning" is a farrago of nonsense, one absurd assertion tumbling over another. But we dare not laugh too much: this man is dangerous.

N. Scott Arnold's outstanding book makes a vital contribution to the debate over socialism; but Arnold has in part misconceived his own achievement.