Mises Daily

Not just the Microsoft case, but the entire history of government regulation of monopoly is shot through with distortions of fact and unjust legal interventions. 

Walter Block decries the use and misuse of these terms in modern political vocabularly. 

Americans have more housing choices than ever before, thanks to the automobile and modern communications. The regulators are fit to be tied, says William Anderson. 

A famed physicist warns of a market-driven genetic caste system. But the real danger is putting the government in charge of any technology.

The New England Journal of Medicine has it backwards: it's public, not private, money that skews research agendas.

James Ostrowski takes on the dissenting Justices, praised by the New York Times, in the Supreme Court's latest Commerce Clause case.

Peter Huber's critique of environmentalism has all the right people very upset. 

What are the economic effects of market dominance by one firm? To hear the Justice Department tell it, market dominance spells disaster

With its latest move to boost interest rates, the Fed is again clouding its role as the sole source of economy-wide price increases.

An agency within an agency, and the political battle over its future, provides a case study of a much larger problem: government can't rationally allocate resources.