Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 19, no. 2 (Summer 2016)
The recent financial crisis of 2007–2008 generated a debate among economists over whether the leading central banks’ unprecedented monetary intervention would spark a massive inflation and depreciation of currencies in the near future. During the meltdown of the banking system, central banks engaged in enormous monetary expansion and drastically increased member bank reserves in an effort to save the financial system and stimulate the economy. Despite this, inflation, at least judged by reported consumer price indexes, has grown at a relatively moderate rate in the period since the crisis. Why is this? Have we entered into a special period where monetary economics is no longer valid, and inflation is no longer a monetary phenomenon? Can central banks around the world now increase their respective money supplies ad libitum without suffering any consequences?
Answering these questions is partly one of the justifications for Peter Bernholz, renowned historian of inflation, to publish a second edition of Monetary Regimes and Inflation.
Patrick is and assistant teaching professor of economics at the University of Tampa and Murray N. Rothbard Research Fellow at the Mises Institute. He completed his PhD in the Department of Economics at George Mason University.
Murray Rothbard wasn't born an Austrian economist. Patrick Newman on how a Columbia-trained mainstream PhD became Mises's heir—in the hundredth year since Rothbard's birth.
The Policy and History faculty panel takes student questions on the state of the movement and the prospects for freedom.
The Fed was sold as a check on Wall Street's power. Wall Street's share of the nation's bank reserves went up after it passed, not down. Patrick Newman on the Federal Reserve as cronyism.
