Legal System

Displaying 1441 - 1450 of 1766
Gary Galles
Few remember the reasons why the Federalists opposed the Bill of Rights, or why the Antifederalists (opponents of giving new power to the federal government) insisted that the new government be bound by them. However, since that debate still provides the basis for upholding our rights against federal assault, it remains as relevant today as two centuries ago. 
William L. Anderson

The answers we receive from the academics in response to the collapse of the Enron Corporation and the implosion of other firms are not answers at all. At best, they deal only with effects, or, at worst, reverse the pattern of cause and effect. To put it another way, writes William Anderson, the people who are supposed to know the answers don’t even know what questions they should pursue.

Ilana Mercer

It is hard to understand the vague and ill-defined laws Martha Stewart and Sam Waksal are accused of violating. But the premise of the law is not hard to divine: Competition in capital markets must proceed from a level playing field. All investors are entitled to the same information advantage irrespective of effort and abilities. In a word, socialism!

William L. Anderson

A government that can jail the rich and well-known at will and confiscate all of their assets is a government that can do the same thing to "ordinary" people--and at a lower cost to government officials, warns William Anderson.  If people really want a prosecutorial state with no limitations, they will have their wish granted--and lose whatever precious freedoms they may still have.

James Ostrowski

Martha Stewart, one of our most productive citizens, is being targeted for destruction by our most unproductive entity, the federal government. To understand the law of insider trading, writes James Ostrowski, you have to be a real insider. Yet, ignorance of the law is no excuse (unless you are a judge).