Samuelson and Rothbard: Two Texts and Two Legacies
It is no wonder that the vast majority of Americans do not know whom, if anyone, they should believe regarding economic pronouncements.
It is no wonder that the vast majority of Americans do not know whom, if anyone, they should believe regarding economic pronouncements.
Persons with an Austrian perspective must evaluate the probability that an Austrian message will reduce their publication chances in mainstream journals.
Joseph T. Salerno (2004) has presented us with the choice of pursuing economics as a vocation or profession. The focus of the vocational economist is the pursuit of truth whereas the professional economist
Both the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics and the Review of Austrian Economics are now publishing regularly and have been doing so ever since their respective inceptions.
Laband and Tollison (2000) warn that specialized Austrian journals encourage excessive within-group communication at the expense of exchanges of ideas with the broader economics profession.
Paul A. Samuelson's legendary textbook, straightforwardly titled Economics, most famously exemplifies Samuelson the writer.
It is much more likely that firsthand inspection by journal editors and reviewers who are relatively more familiar with the subject matter in question will place an appropriate value on the prospective scholarly contributions.
The efficacy of the decentralized market process is perhaps the foremost contribution of Austrian economics. But if Austrians are correct about the performance of spontaneous order processes,
Given the temper of the times it was surprising that following the American Revolution there appeared proposals for national systems of education.
This paper will be primarily concerned with identification and documentation of the educational viewpoints espoused by the European anarchists of t