Political Science

The report on the front page of today’s (Monday’s) Wall Street Journal of political correctness in natural science goes a long way to explain the penetration of the state and its agents into the science of economics. The wistful affectation of positivist economists to ape the physical sciences seems more misplaced than ever in light of this brouhaha over what the earth’s temperature(s) have been over the past millennium.

Tax Break: Unfair “Gift?”

A controversy is brewing over the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which created a one-year tax holiday offering companies a 5.25% tax rate instead of the normal 35% tax rate on profits repatriated from abroad. Companies are usually forced to keep their profits abroad to avoid high US taxes. In 2003, US corporations added $119.2 billion to undistributed foreign earnings - 75% of their total foreign profits, and brought back only $39.9 billion to the US.

Persecuted for Teaching Economics, and Teaching it Well

The following post was sent to EconLaw-L, Sunday, February 13, 2005, by Lloyd Cohen, law professor at George Mason University. It is Professor Cohen’s response to a question asked by the reporter who prepared this story in the Chronicle of Higher Education.
A reporter from the Chronicle of Higher Education asked me to answer a specific question about the Hoppe affair and to offer whatever views I might have on the question.

Toxic-Sarbanes

The US government’s hypocritical, ill-conceived legislation of accounting morality known as the Oxley-Sarbanes Act has sparked a “deregistration” movement among European and other non-US firms that have registered with US stock exchanges for listing of their shares. This is described in a Wall Street Journal article that reports a reversal of the US-listing trend begun over a decade ago by Mercedes-Benz (before its merger with Chrysler).

Economic Illiteracy Watch

This whopper from Peter Schiff. It’s hard to say it any better than Peter, so I’ll let him take over:

[shown] today on CNBC, as Steve Leisman and a guest described American consumption as being “a sacrifice,” and American consumers as “bearing the brunt of world consumption,” and of having an “obligation to consume.”