Pick and Choose Your Government Intervention
I’m not on board the anti-Splenda train. Here’s an article that tweaked my tweakables in regards to those who have a love-hate relationship with statism (mine is all hate).
I’m not on board the anti-Splenda train. Here’s an article that tweaked my tweakables in regards to those who have a love-hate relationship with statism (mine is all hate).
“The international medical relief agency Médecins sans Frontiares is tracking down hundreds of thousands of donors worldwide to its Asian tsunami appeal and offering them their money back.”
They received too much tsunami cash! (See also this older article on the same.) What was the reason behind all that government aid?
The US Mint has a great, new idea. (Courtesy of The Onion.)
From a pre-junk bond demotion piece on GM, sent to me by Robert Blumen:
Say what you will about Levitt and Dubner, but they sure know how to sell a book. The co-authors (Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner) of Freakonomics (William Morrow, 2005) apparently sent early copies to influential bloggers, they set up their own promotional blog , they just had an op-ed (based on a book chapter) in USA Today, and—honor of honors—Levitt recently appeared on Jon Stewart’s The Daily Show.
A friend is busy trying to persuade the publisher of an old-line journal to put the back issues online, and the publisher has a predictable response, albeit one that you hear less and less of these days: if I put the journal (substitute article, book, etc.) online people won’t pay for it. Variation on the theme: if you give away the cow, people won’t buy the milk.
Here is the compressed case for going online:
My wife alerted me to this surprising passage from An Unsocial Socialist. Did Mises read Shaw? (This came out in 1883.) The whole opening of Chapter X is funny, but here’s the best excerpt:
I’ve been skimming over the early JLS issues and have particularly enjoyed the articles generated by Nozick’s attack on anarchy. One article in particular raises an issue that has bugged me for a long time: Certainty as a goal in social affairs, (e.g. “No Child Left Behind”). Jeffrey Paul in “Nozick, Anarchism and Procedural Rights” (PDF) exemplifies this position in his argument against anarchy (emphasis mine):