Natural and Neutral Rates of Interest in Theory and Policy Formulation
[This article originally appeared in the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics.]
[This article originally appeared in the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics.]
The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently released the summary of its latest, forthcoming report on global warming. It’s most trumpeted finding is that the existence of global warming is now “unequivocal.”
For some unknown reason, some of Wilhelm Röpke’s best work has long been out of print, including his 1959 book International Order and Economic Integration (maybe the title alone killed the book!). In any case, in prepping the volume for online availability, I can’t resist quoting this passionate statement about how the early generation of socialists had embraced the state that had created the war that they so hated (WWI).
Mystery solved. I first heard about the deadly flu pandemic of 1918 in an obscure blues song from that era. As I learned more about it, like that it was the worst pandemic in world history, I wondered why there was relative silence about this horrifying event, relative to, say, World War I and the Great Depression about which any schoolchild learns. Garrison Keillor’s Writer’s Almanac gives this rather strong clue:
The story of the debacle at Walter Reed that the Washington Post broke has generated commentary all over the place.
Finally, the private sector figures out how to move people around from home to work in buses: $0, wireless internet, leather seats, and more. Looking at the failure of mass transit in the past, one might be led to believe that individual cars are the only market solution. But this Google experiment shows that the problem isn’t the means of transport so much as government management and ownership.
In Jan Narveson’s thought-provoking and elegantly-written The Libertarian Idea (1990), he discusses an admission by a Marxist, G.A. Cohen, of a serious problem with communal ownership of property. As Narveson notes (p.
Timothy Noah’s Would You Privatize Defense?The case for socialized medicine, Part 1, in the March 6, 2007 Slate unwittingly shows the danger of minarchism and the idea of public goods. Once you accept the notion that the state is legitimate and there are some public goods, then the door is open to argue that more and more domains of private life should be considered public goods and thus handled by the state. In short, any sort of state-advocacy, including minarchy, is a recipe for socialism.